UI
UiPath, Inc. (PATH)·Q2 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 FY26 delivered a clean beat: revenue $361.7M (+14% YoY) vs S&P Global consensus ~$347.3M; non-GAAP diluted EPS $0.15 vs consensus ~$0.08. GAAP gross margin 82% and non-GAAP gross margin 84%; non-GAAP operating margin 17% . Estimates marked with * are from S&P Global.
- UiPath raised FY26 guidance: revenue to $1.571–$1.576B (from $1.549–$1.554B), ARR to $1.834–$1.839B (from $1.820–$1.825B), and non-GAAP operating income to ~$340M (from ~$305M) .
- Key KPIs: ARR $1.723B (+11% YoY), net new ARR $31M, DBNR 108%, software gross margin 90% (non-GAAP), and cash/marketable securities $1.52B; buyback of 8.3M shares at ~$12.10 average supports capital return .
- Near-term catalysts: continued agentic adoption (450+ customers building agents; ~1M agent runs), broad ecosystem partnerships (Microsoft, OpenAI, NVIDIA, Snowflake), and public sector normalization; management notes minimal FY26 top-line contribution from agentic in early phase, tempering expectations .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Revenue and EPS beat with stronger non-GAAP profitability: revenue $361.7M, non-GAAP operating income $62.3M (17% margin), non-GAAP EPS $0.15; “exceeded the high end of our guidance across all key financial metrics” .
- Agentic platform traction and ecosystem: 450+ customers actively developing agents; UiPath Maestro orchestrated ~170K process instances; partnerships deepened with Microsoft, OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Snowflake, supporting ROI narratives. “Automation and AI are stronger together…what brings it all together is orchestration” .
- Public sector momentum and GTM stabilization: wins with Veterans Affairs, Coast Guard; U.S. Navy expanding IDP; GTM rebuilt for scale with value-based plays and tighter pipeline inspection, improving predictability .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP results remain subdued: GAAP operating loss of $(20)M and GAAP diluted EPS ~$0.00 despite non-GAAP strength; professional services cost intensity elevated (COGS PS&O $24.95M) .
- Licenses revenue flat YoY (Q2 licenses $112.2M vs $112.3M prior year), highlighting mixed demand in perpetual-like motions; DBNR steady at 108% but below FY25 Q4’s 110% .
- Management cautions agentic monetization is early; “don’t expect a material top-line contribution in fiscal 2026,” and macro variability persists despite FX tailwinds in guidance .
Financial Results
Headline Metrics vs Prior Periods and Estimates
Values with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Revenue
KPIs
Guidance Changes
CFO noted FX tailwinds embedded in guidance: ~+$2M for Q3 revenue/ARR and ~+$7M for FY26 revenue/ARR since Q1 guide .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Automation and AI are stronger together…what brings it all together is orchestration. With UiPath Maestro, we unify agents, robots, and people…so outcomes are measurable and repeatable.”
- CEO: “We exceeded the high end of our guidance across all key financial metrics…AI and agentic solutions are helping us win deals and increase deal sizes faster than traditional automation engagements.”
- CFO: “We delivered overall gross margins of 84%, software gross margin was 90%…we repurchased 8.3 million shares at an average price of $12.10…we don’t expect a material top-line contribution in fiscal 2026.”
- CFO: “We are raising guidance…reflecting progress on our operating priorities and incremental FX tailwind since Q1.”
Q&A Highlights
- Agentic adoption and deal sizes: 450 customers actively building agents; agentic increases deal sizes and uncovers deterministic automation opportunities, reinforcing RPA/API demand .
- DBNR stability and macro prudence: DBNR implied in guidance stabilizing; public sector buying normalizing, but prudence remains embedded .
- Subscription revenue cadence: sequential step-up in subscription revenue in Q2 follows a leap-year impact in Q1; now “back to stable” .
- Go-to-market health: pipeline quality, forecasting predictability, and field-product feedback loops improved; empowered, customer-centric field organization .
- Maestro pitch: vendor-agnostic orchestration across systems; tight integration with automation platform differentiates vs business-system-native orchestrators .
- Pricing: agentic portfolio monetized via consumption-based model; customers working through predictability of pricing/business cases .
Estimates Context
- Q2 FY26: Revenue $361.7M vs consensus ~$347.3M*; non-GAAP diluted EPS $0.15 vs consensus ~$0.08*. Beat driven by agentic momentum, execution discipline, and FX tailwind .
- Prior quarters: Q1 FY26 revenue $356.6M vs ~$332.3M* and non-GAAP EPS $0.11 vs ~$0.10* . Q4 FY25 revenue $423.6M vs ~$425.3M*, non-GAAP EPS $0.26 vs ~$0.19* .
- Forward: Q3 FY26 consensus revenue ~$392.9M* and EPS ~$0.146*; management guides revenue $390–$395M and non-GAAP OI ~$70M, with ~+$2M FX tailwind since Q1 guide .
Values with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Strong print with beats on revenue and non-GAAP EPS; non-GAAP operating margin expanded to 17%, underscoring operating discipline amid agentic ramp .
- FY26 guidance raised across revenue, ARR, and non-GAAP operating income; FX tailwinds contribute modestly, but underlying execution and adoption drive the increase .
- Agentic orchestration (Maestro) and ecosystem partnerships (Microsoft, OpenAI, NVIDIA, Snowflake) are strategic levers for larger, multi-solution deals and stickier platform adoption .
- Public sector shows improving momentum (VA, Coast Guard, Navy), reducing a prior headwind into 2H; monitor conversion from pilots to production scale .
- Mix shift: Subscriptions continue to rise while licenses were flat YoY; recurring metrics (ARR, DBNR) stable to improving, supporting durability .
- Non-GAAP vs GAAP gap remains: GAAP operating loss and near-zero GAAP EPS highlight ongoing SBC and restructuring add-backs; still, management targets GAAP profitability “near term” .
- Watch catalysts: Fusion event product cadence, agentic monetization learning curve (consumption pricing), and Q3 execution vs prudent guide; CEO’s 10b5-1 plan (<5% holdings) is a potential sentiment overhang but not a control shift .